bvp4c or classical odesolver
Info
Diese Frage ist geschlossen. Öffnen Sie sie erneut, um sie zu bearbeiten oder zu beantworten.
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Hello,
i solved an initial BVP by the method of lines in the following way:
i=1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i),v(i+1))) + ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-Ax(i));
i=2:N-1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)+0.5*dx).*F(i)...
-(xcen(i)-0.5*dx).*F(i-1)) + 1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-2*Ax(i)+Ax(i-1));
i=N;
dvdt(i)= omega^2/dx*(xcen(end)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i-1),v(i)) - ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i)-Ax(i-1));
Is it better or probably faster to use bvp4c instead ? What are the reasons why i would like to use bvp4c and not the approach i used ?
Any comments are appreciated
Best Wishes
Moritz
Antworten (0)
Diese Frage ist geschlossen.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!