System identification tool and Simulink
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Hi guys,
i have create some estimation models in the SI Tool. They have a fitness of 94%. Also the fitness ot my validation data is not bad. Like 82%. This is the result of a Hammerstein-Wiener-Model.
No i want this result simulate in Simulink. I use the block for Hammerstein-Wiener-Models, the inputs, and a scope for the output.
Why i get a differ of the simulationresult and SI-Tool result??
Has anyone an idea why the result are not same??
Marcus
Akzeptierte Antwort
Weitere Antworten (1)
Markus
am 24 Aug. 2012
0 Stimmen
1 Kommentar
Rajiv Singh
am 7 Sep. 2012
Initial conditions should not be thought of as a property of the model. It is really the effect of the environment on the initial set up of the model. In a real-life application, you should think about what conditions existed before the model simulation started, or what type of assumptions you can make about them. Some common choices are:
- system at rest (zero)
- system at steady state equilibrium (constant I/o values)
- system at some operating point specified in various ways; use isnlhw/findop to transform your specifications to numerical values of states.
If the goal is to pick initial states that maximize the fit to some measured output signal for a given input signal, then FINDSTATES is your friend.
Kategorien
Mehr zu Transform Data finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!