Why doesn't symprod recognize indexed variables?
3 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
I was expecting to get: k1*k2*k3*k4. Instead . . . .
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Stephan
am 26 Dez. 2018
Bearbeitet: Stephan
am 26 Dez. 2018
Hi,
try:
syms k(n)
symprod(k(n),n,1,4)
this should give you the expected result.
Best regards
Stephan
1 Kommentar
Walter Roberson
am 27 Dez. 2018
Bearbeitet: Walter Roberson
am 27 Dez. 2018
However, going from the symbolic function calls k(1)*k(2)*k(3)*k(4) to k1*k2*k3*k4 becomes tricky. And the k(1) and so on in the symprod result will be function calls, not indexing.
Weitere Antworten (1)
Walter Roberson
am 27 Dez. 2018
MATLAB does not permit symbolic variables to be indices because it does not know how to index a definite matrix at an unresolved location.
When you define k as a matrix and try
symprod(k(n), n, 1, 4)
then that is equivalent to
TTTTTT = k(n);
symprod(TTTTTT, n, 1, 4)
because argument evaluation is always done first before the function itself is invoked. So the k(n) part has to be meaningful outside the context of the symprod() or symsum()... but it isn't.
When you want to do a symprod or symsum that would call for the dummy variable to be used as an index, then what you need to do is to replace the symprod or symsum with creation of a vector of definite values that are then prod() or sum(). For example,
TTTTTT = k(1:4);
prod(TTTTTT)
or more compactly,
prod(k(1:4))
or even
prod(k)
since you defined k as being only 4 long.
If you had something more complicated such as
symprod(sin(k(n)^n), n, 1, 4)
you would again proceed with definite values:
prod( sin(k(1:4)).^(1:4) )
3 Kommentare
Stephan
am 27 Dez. 2018
Since this answer is meeting your requirements much better than mine, you should unaccept my answer and accept this one.
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Calculus finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!