large sparse matrices fail with accumarray

2 views (last 30 days)
Large sparse matrices are easily created by 'sparse':
a = sparse(1e6, 1e6);
is working fine. However,
b = accumarray([1 1], 1, [2^31 1], @sum, [], true);
fails with "maximum variable size allowed by the program is exceeded." Matrix sizes with less than 2^31 elements are going through.
Why is this stupid limitation and how to circumvent it? I need accumarray to work on matrices of that size. The solution must be fast.
Using R2007a 32-bit Linux.
Cheers,
Balint

Answers (2)

the cyclist
the cyclist on 20 Mar 2012
I believe this particular memory issue is related to the addressing of elements of the array. This limitation is mentioned (although not discussed in detail) in Section 1.5 of this guide to memory use: http://www.mathworks.com/support/tech-notes/1100/1107.html. There is also discussion in this document: http://www.mathworks.com/support/tech-notes/1100/1106.html
  3 Comments
Balint Takacs
Balint Takacs on 21 Mar 2012
Thank you. Unfortunately I have no option to upgrade.
I guess the problem is related to accumarray creating some temporary, which is limited by this bound you are referring to.
I have solved my problem by slightly changing the data structures, and using sparse(i,j,val,m,n) instead accumarray.

Sign in to comment.


Richard Crozier
Richard Crozier on 21 May 2012
I'm not sure how your two statements here are equivalent?
a = sparse(1e6, 1e6);
creates a sparse matrix of all zeros of dimensions (1e6, 1e6), making only 1e12 elements, and nothing needs to be allocated since there are no non-zero values
b = accumarray([1 1], 1, [2^31 1], @sum, [], true);
Creates a sparse vector of size (2^31, 1) with a single nonzero value allocated at (1,1). The equivalent call to this is surely:
>> a = sparse(1, 1, 1, 2^31, 1)
which fails with:
??? Error using ==> sparse Sparse matrix sizes must be non-negative integers less than MAXSIZE as defined by COMPUTER. Use HELP COMPUTER for more details.
Which is probably the same error in another guise.
EDIT:
in fact even
a = sparse(2^31, 1)
fails with this error.
  2 Comments
Richard Crozier
Richard Crozier on 14 Jun 2012
You're right by the way, it does indeed have this stupid limitation, I've now come across it elsewhere. Not sure why it doesn't happen in the exact case above on my machine though.

Sign in to comment.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by