why regexprep much slower than strrep
4 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Consider the following simplified example:
str = cellstr(repmat('987_890',1e5,1));
timeit(@()strrep(str,'_',''))
timeit(@()regexprep(str,'_',''))
strrep is ~3x faster than regexprep() on R014b - Win7 - cpu i5 3rd gen.
I reckon regexprep carries some overhead for being more flexible but I would expect it to be slightly slower than strrep unless it does the replacement on the go (to allow backtracking). However, in this simple substitution I hoped the engine was smart enough to recognize it does not need to backtrack.
Any thoughts?
0 Kommentare
Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Characters and Strings finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!