Filter löschen
Filter löschen

Equivalent of passing structure to "varargin" for the new "Function Argument Validation" introduced in 2019b

17 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
I have a compatibility question about the new method of adding name-value pairs to functions introduced in MATLAB 2019b as discussed on this help page. I think the new argument validation tools are very powerful and easier to use, but there's a special use case for varargin and inputParser that I can't get to work.
In previous versions of MATLAB, I've used varargin with inputparser to enable name-value pairs in functions. I only used these as optional arguments, so they were always at the end of my function signature and I only used addParameters. With inputParser, I am able to pass either the variables in, or a structure with field names that correspond to the variables. For the sample function:
function demo(varargin)
% Parse the input.
p = inputParser;
% Rest of function.
I could call it like this:
Or, to make the function call more compact, I could call it like this:
S.param1 = 7;
S.param2 = 8;
S.param3 = 9;
With the second method, inputParser would interpret the fields of the structure as the name-value pairs.
With the new function argument validation tools, I can eliminate the need for varargin and inputparser and use the built in tools:
function demo(NameValueArgs)
NameValueArgs.param1 = 1.5;
NameValueArgs.param2 = -8;
NameValueArgs.param3 = 17;
% Rest of function.
However, I can't pass a structure with the name value pairs like I can with varargin and inputparser, it produces an error.
Is there a way to get the "old" functionality back using the new arguments feature of functions? For functions with many name-value pairs, the function calls can get very long otherwise.
Thanks in advance!

Antworten (1)

Tejas am 25 Apr. 2024 um 10:15
Hello Nate,
It seems you are looking to streamline function calls by passing input arguments as name-value pairs in the form of a structure. This approach aims to make the function call more compact and convenient.
However, the new approach of function argument validation, expects inputs to be in the form of name-value pairs. Consequently, providing a structure directly as an input will cause an issue.
To pass structure as an input, I would like to suggest a workaround:
  • Create a structure containing name-value pairs as per requirements.
S = struct();
S.param1 = 1.5;
S.param2 = -8;
S.param3 = 17;
  • Convert this structure into name-value pairs and store them in a cell array within a variable.
S = reshape([fieldnames(S), struct2cell(S)].', 1, []);
  • Pass the contents of this variable as the input to function.
function demo(NameValueArgs)
NameValueArgs.param1 (1,1) double = 0;
NameValueArgs.param2 (1,1) double = 0;
NameValueArgs.param3 (1,1) double = 0;
result = NameValueArgs.param1 + NameValueArgs.param2 + NameValueArgs.param3;
Here is a screenshot showcasing what the output looks like.
The file has been named argsValidation.m.
Please refer to below documentations for better understanding of functions used in the workaround:
Hope it helps!


Mehr zu Argument Definitions finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange




Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by