Any mathematical mistake in my script ?
1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Chee Hao Hor
am 10 Aug. 2021
Kommentiert: Chee Hao Hor
am 12 Aug. 2021
Hi, I am trying to plot the self-derived analytical solution using matlab. However, I get different answer from what I obtained using excel sheet.
I suspect the mistake is in somewhere within this script, where I could have miss out.
Could anyone spare a help here ?
Self-derived Analytical Solution :
syms n y real
assume([n y] >= 0);
Y = 0:0.02:1;
b =1; t=1; br=1; Pr=1;
%t = t*
K1=(1-exp(-((2.*n)+1).^2.*pi.^2.*t./(4.*Pr)))./(((2.*n)+1).^2.*pi.^2);
K2=((((2.*n)+1).^2.*pi.^2.*exp(-((2.*n)+1).^2.*pi.^2.*t./(4.*Pr)))-(((2.*n)+1).^2.*pi.^2.*cos(2.*b.*t))-(8.*b.*Pr.*sin(2.*b.*t)))./((64.*b.^2.*Pr.^2)+(((2.*n)+1).^4.*pi.^4));
T = subs( sum( subs( 8.*br./(((2.*n)+1).*pi).*(K1+K2).*sin((((2.*n)+1)./2).*pi.*y), n, 1:100 )), y, Y );
Tn = double(T);
disp(Tn);
plot(Tn,Y);
Thanks,
Andy
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Alan Stevens
am 10 Aug. 2021
Easier to check like this
b=1; t=1; br=1; Pr=1;
d = @(n) (2*n + 1)*pi;
c = @(n) d(n).^2;
k1 = @(n) ( 1 - exp( -c(n)*t/(4*Pr) ) )./c(n);
k2 = @(n) c(n).*exp( -c(n)*t/(4*Pr) ) - c(n)*cos(2*n*t) - 8*b*Pr*sin(2*b*t);
k3 = @(n) c(n).^2 + 64*b^2*Pr^2;
K = @(n) k1(n) + k2(n)./k3(n);
term = @(y,n) 8*br./d(n).*K(n).*sin(d(n)*y/2);
y = 0:0.02:1;
N = numel(y);
T = zeros(1,N);
for i=1:N
for n = 0:100
T(i) = term(y(i),n) + T(i);
end
end
figure
plot(y,T),grid
xlabel('y'), ylabel('T')
3 Kommentare
Alan Stevens
am 11 Aug. 2021
"1. Shouldn't it be all using .* and ./ since we are summing up the "n" term by term (consider as element wise sum up right) ? I tried using your current script, it gives same results with I added all with .* and ./. I could not imagine how they sum up using mixed of *; .*; / and ./."
Yes, you can replace the .* etc by just . I put .* initially, as I hadn't decided if I would use a loop or vector indexing.
"2. In your case, you first sum up the T for a particular of y location (here is up to 100 n terms, increment 1 each time). Then do the same for rest of the discretized y which defined by array of zeros N elements (from 0 to 1, increment 0.02 each time), am i right ?"
Yes, that's right.
"3. If i have a similar analytical solution that consists of triple summation terms, it involved piecewise function, using for loop method should work also right ?"
Yes, it should.
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Creating and Concatenating Matrices finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!